. , ? . https://ukonf.com/doc/na.2020.12.01.pdf ISSN 2411-7609.
, , , .
, , , . , , , [3].
. . , 3 : - : . - : - : . .. [4]. . . . 3. . , . – () . – , , - . . – . , . – , , . – , . , , , , . . , , . . . , – . , , , . – -, , -, .. – . . 3 , :
– . :
- ,
- .
– (, ) . :
- , .
:
-
, , .
1. , , , 659 15.10.2019.
2. .. : , // - «» 9, 6 (2017)
3. Olsen E., Zhou, Lee D., Padunchwit P. Performance Measurement System and Relationships with Performance Results: A Case Analysis of a Continuous Improvement Approach to PMS Design, // International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2007, 56(7), p. 559-582.
4. Keegan, D., Eiler, R. and Jones, C. Are Your Performance Measures Obsolete? // Management Accounting, 1989, 70(12), .45-50.
5. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. Putting the balanced scorecard to work//Harvard Business Review, 1993, September-October, p. 134-47.
6. Barr S. Practical Performance Measurement: Using the PuMP Blueprint for Fast, Easy and Engaging KPIs. Sidney, 2014. 324 p.
KPI
4 (100% )
, !